This blog is also available on Substack. Follow along there for addition insights into the artisanal spirits sector and supply chain technology.
When David Meets Goliath: A Tale of Two Restaurants
Imagine two restaurant owners opening their doors on the same day in 2010. Sarah owns a small farm-to-table bistro in Portland, while Marcus runs a family-owned Italian trattoria in rural Tuscany. Both share the same passion for authentic cuisine and quality ingredients, but their paths to success diverge dramatically based on one crucial factor: access to infrastructure.
Sarah could leverage OpenTable for reservations, Square for payments, and eventually DoorDash for delivery—all without building her own technology team. She tapped into shared services that leveled the playing field against chain restaurants with massive IT budgets. Marcus, however, struggled with everything from accepting international credit cards to managing reservations, lacking access to similar platforms in his market.
Fast-forward to 2025: Sarah's bistro has become a local institution with a thriving online presence, while Marcus closed his doors during the pandemic, unable to adapt quickly enough without the digital infrastructure that Sarah took for granted.
This same dynamic is playing out across the artisanal wine and spirits industry, where passionate craft producers face a stark choice: remain local and limited, or navigate the bewildering maze of global distribution alone. But a third option is emerging—one that promises to transform how exceptional small-batch spirits and wines reach appreciative palates worldwide.
The Great Distribution Divide
The global artisanal wine and spirits market, valued at $273.24 billion in 2024 and projected to reach $423.18 billion by 2032, faces a fundamental paradox. Consumer demand for authentic, craft beverages has never been higher, with Latin America's craft spirits market alone growing at over 25% annually. Yet the very producers creating these sought-after products often cannot reach the customers who want them most.
The problem isn't passion or quality—it's infrastructure. While a tech startup can launch globally from a laptop, an artisanal mezcal producer in Oaxaca faces a Kafkaesque journey through regulatory compliance, international shipping, and distribution networks designed for multinational corporations, not family operations.
Consider the reality facing Maria, a third-generation mezcal producer whose family has perfected their craft over decades. To legally sell her mezcal in the United States, she needs federal TTB permits, FDA facility registration, state import licenses, and Certificate of Label Approval (COLA)—a process that typically costs $5,000-15,000 and takes 8-12 weeks, assuming no mistakes. That's before she even ships a single bottle.
Enter shared-service platforms—a revolutionary approach that applies the same network effects that transformed e-commerce, transportation, and hospitality to the complex world of artisanal beverages. These platforms promise to democratize global market access while preserving the craft character that makes these products special.
Beyond the Hype: What Shared-Service Platforms Actually Do
Framework 1: The Infrastructure Cost Comparison
Source: Analysis of platform economics vs. traditional market entry costs
Key Insight: The economics are so dramatically different that platforms don't just make global expansion more affordable—they make it fundamentally possible for producers who could never achieve the minimum viable scale independently.
Successful shared-service platforms excel across three core dimensions: compliance as a service, logistics networking, and market access democratization.
Compliance as a Service transforms the industry's biggest barrier into a competitive advantage. Rather than each producer hiring compliance consultants and learning regulations from scratch, platforms maintain centralized expertise and automated systems. LibDib exemplifies this approach, functioning as a fully licensed distributor across 18 U.S. states while allowing thousands of small brands to access these markets through its digital platform.
Logistics Networking creates economies of scale that rival major corporations. By consolidating shipments from multiple producers, platforms achieve container utilization rates and shipping costs that individual small producers could never access. Lexir's European operations demonstrate this perfectly—craft producers can ship pallets to Lexir's bonded warehouses, which then handle last-mile fulfillment across multiple EU countries.
Market Access Democratization might be the most powerful element. Traditional distribution often operates through relationship-based gatekeeping, where small producers struggle to gain distributor attention. Platforms create transparent, merit-based market access where quality and consumer demand drive success rather than relationship capital or minimum volume commitments.
The Questions Nobody Asks (But Everyone Should)
Despite growing enthusiasm for platform solutions, several critical questions remain largely unexamined in industry discussions.
Who Really Controls the Customer Relationship? Traditional distributors have long been criticized for owning customer relationships that rightfully belong to brands. But platforms present their own version of this challenge. When a consumer discovers a craft gin through a platform's recommendation algorithm, who owns that relationship—the producer, the platform, or the end retailer?
This question becomes especially sensitive when platforms begin developing private label products or start favoring certain producers over others. The very data that makes platforms effective—purchase patterns, geographic preferences, price sensitivity—could theoretically be used to compete with the producers they serve.
What Happens When Platforms Fail? The ghost kitchen industry provides a sobering case study. Companies like Kitchen United raised over $100 million only to shut down operations, leaving restaurants stranded. When Winc, a direct-to-consumer wine platform, filed for bankruptcy despite $112 million in funding, both suppliers and customers faced sudden disruption.
Are We Creating New Monopolies? The network effects that make platforms powerful also tend toward market concentration. Amazon's marketplace dominance and Google's search monopoly demonstrate how platforms can evolve from democratizing forces into gatekeepers with unprecedented power.
Framework 2: The Platform Complexity Iceberg
Source: Analysis of platform operational requirements and common failure modes
Key Insight: Platform "simplicity" requires massive backend sophistication. The most successful platforms invest heavily in systems that users never see but immediately feel in the form of successfully completed transactions or progress failures at crucial moments.
The alcoholic beverage industry presents unique challenges that general e-commerce platforms cannot address. Age verification isn't just checking a box—it requires integration with identity verification services and liability management. Tax compliance involves understanding intricate relationships between federal excise taxes, state taxes, local taxes, and international duties that can change daily.
Case Study: Liberation Distribution's Digital Revolution
Liberation Distribution (LibDib) represents one of the most successful implementations of the shared-service platform model. Founded in 2017, LibDib created a fully licensed digital distributor that by 2025 covers 75% of the U.S. market through partnerships with major wholesaler RNDC.
The Traditional Problem: Under the three-tier system, a craft brewery in Oregon wanting to sell in New York needed to find a distributor willing to carry their products, often requiring minimum volume commitments that small producers couldn't meet.
LibDib's Solution: Rather than trying to eliminate the three-tier system, LibDib works within it by becoming the licensed distributor. Producers sign up through LibDib's platform, list their products, and immediately gain access to retailers and restaurants across LibDib's territory.
The Results: LibDib has enabled thousands of small brands to enter major markets like California, New York, and Florida. A small winery in Sonoma can now easily supply a restaurant in Manhattan, with LibDib handling all compliance, logistics, and payment processing.
Critical Lessons: LibDib's approach demonstrates that platforms don't need to disrupt entire industry structures to create value. By finding creative ways to work within existing regulations while dramatically improving efficiency and access, they've created a sustainable model benefiting all stakeholders.
The Sustainability Paradox
One of the most underreported aspects of the platform revolution is its environmental impact. While platforms promise efficiency through consolidated shipping, the reality is more complex.
Framework 3: Platform Environmental Impact Assessment
Source: Environmental impact analysis of platform vs. traditional distribution models
Key Insight: Platforms create both efficiency gains and volume increases, making their net environmental impact highly dependent on implementation choices and growth patterns.
The Efficiency Argument: Shared logistics networks should theoretically reduce environmental impact by maximizing container utilization and optimizing shipping routes. When 20 craft distilleries share container space instead of each shipping separately, the carbon footprint per bottle should decrease significantly.
The Acceleration Effect: However, platforms also dramatically increase market access, potentially leading to higher overall shipping volumes. A mezcal producer who previously sold only locally might now ship globally, resulting in higher total emissions despite more efficient per-unit logistics.
The Democratization Myth
Perhaps the most persistent misconception about shared-service platforms is that they automatically democratize market access. While platforms certainly lower barriers to entry, they also create new forms of competitive advantage.
Algorithmic Bias: Platform recommendation algorithms often favor products with consistent inventory, professional photography, and strong initial sales velocity—characteristics that correlate with business sophistication rather than product quality.
Technology Adoption Barriers: Successfully using platforms requires digital literacy, professional marketing content, and data analysis capabilities. Rural producers or traditional family operations may struggle with these requirements, potentially creating a new digital divide.
Network Effects for Established Brands: Platforms' review systems and recommendation engines tend to amplify existing brand recognition. A well-known craft distillery joining a platform often gains traction faster than an unknown producer making superior products.
Counter-Narrative: The Platform Dependency Risk
While celebrating platform innovations, industry observers rarely discuss the potential downsides of platform dependency.
The Commoditization Risk: Platforms naturally tend toward standardization and comparison shopping. When diverse artisanal products are displayed side-by-side with price comparisons, the unique stories that justify premium pricing can be lost.
The Race to the Bottom: Platform competition can pressure producers toward cost reduction rather than quality improvement. When platforms highlight "deals" and "bargains," artisanal producers may feel compelled to compete on price rather than craftsmanship.
The Data Dependence: As platforms accumulate consumer data, participating producers become increasingly dependent on platform insights for business decisions. This data dependency can stifle independent thinking and make producers vulnerable to algorithm changes.
The Exit Cost: Once a producer has built their business around a platform's infrastructure, leaving becomes increasingly difficult. Customer relationships, reviews, and operational processes all become tied to the platform.
This contrarian view doesn't suggest that platforms are inherently harmful, but rather that their adoption should be strategic rather than wholehearted. The most resilient producers may be those who use platforms as one component of a diversified strategy.
Future Scenarios: Three Paths Forward
Scenario 1: Platform Consolidation (Most Likely) Market dynamics suggest increasing consolidation, with 3-5 major players eventually dominating global markets. These mature platforms would offer comprehensive services while developing sophisticated algorithms for matching products with consumers.
Scenario 2: Regulatory Fragmentation (Moderate Probability) Governments might implement platform-specific regulations or require local ownership, fragmenting the global platform ecosystem into regional players with incompatible standards.
Scenario 3: Ecosystem Diversification (Lower Probability) The platform landscape might fragment into specialized niches—compliance-only services, logistics-only platforms, marketing-focused networks—allowing producers to mix and match services.
Practical Implications for Industry Stakeholders
For Artisanal Producers, success requires treating platforms as powerful tools rather than complete solutions. The most successful producers maintain diversified strategies—using platforms for market expansion while preserving direct relationships and traditional sales channels.
For Traditional Distributors, platforms represent both competitive threat and potential partnership opportunity. Forward-thinking distributors are developing their own platform capabilities or focusing on services that platforms cannot easily replicate.
For Technology Investors, the platform space offers significant opportunity but requires understanding of industry-specific complexities. The most successful platform investments will go to companies that combine technological sophistication with deep industry expertise.
Conclusion: The Networked Future of Craft
The shared-service platform revolution in artisanal wine and spirits represents more than technological innovation—it embodies a fundamental shift toward networked, collaborative business models that could reshape entire industries.
Like the restaurant owners in our opening story, today's craft producers face a choice: embrace the infrastructure that modern platforms provide, or risk being left behind. The most successful path forward likely involves thoughtful platform adoption that preserves what makes artisanal products special while leveraging technology to reach appreciative consumers worldwide.
The ultimate test of shared-service platforms won't be their ability to scale or optimize efficiency, but whether they can genuinely preserve and promote the craft character that makes artisanal beverages worth seeking out in the first place. Early indicators suggest this is possible, but only with careful attention to the values and relationships that define the artisanal beverage community.
As this transformation accelerates, industry stakeholders must remain vigilant about preserving what makes craft special while embracing tools that can amplify their reach and impact. The future belongs to those who thoughtfully integrate the best of both worlds.
Join the Conversation
How do you see shared-service platforms affecting your corner of the industry? For producers: What barriers to global expansion frustrate you most? For distributors and retailers: How are platforms changing your relationships with suppliers? For investors: Which aspects seem most promising or challenging?
Reach out directly and share your experiences to continue this conversation. The future of artisanal wine and spirits will be shaped by how we collectively navigate these transformative changes.
